Research Ethics
Health Research for Developing Countries: Reason and Emotion in Bioethics
2009 Parallel Paper Presentation, Global Bioethics: Emerging Challenges Facing Human Dignity.
Length: 24:52
- Read more
- Download audio file
- 391 downloads
- 27 plays
How Much Do We Care When Truth Replaces Fiction? Ethical Conduct and Human Subjects Research in Africa
Length: 8:11
- Read more
- Download audio file
- 765 downloads
- 0 plays
The Interface Between Science and Ethics: Probing the Deeper Questions
Debates over bioethical issues necessarily involve people from diverse circles. Scientists, health care professionals, lawyers, clergy, and representatives from other disciplines join formally trained bioethicists in assessing the appropriateness of various forays within medicine and biotechnology. It is my hypothesis that the way scientists think is often so fundamentally different that the "answers" to bioethical issues offered by the non-scientific community are perceived as (at best) only minimally relevant by those who are actually pursuing the research in question.
Human Embryo Research After the Genome
Recently, the Bush administration planted a flag on ethical high ground by updating the charter of the federal advisory committee that addresses the safety of human research subjects to consider the welfare of human embryos along with that of fetuses, children, and adults.
The Good News and Bad News About Creating Embryos for Research
There is good news and there is bad news. First, the bad news. Confirming what we knew all along, scientists at the Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine in Virginia, do not think it is sufficient to do research on human embryos that are "going to die anyway," to follow the popular mantra. They announced 11 July 2001 that they intentionally created human embryos from donor eggs and sperm with the sole purpose of conducting destructive research on those nascent humans.





