Frozen Embryos: Stem Cell Source or Human Life?
by Amy Coxon, Ph.D
We live in an age of increasing disregard for the value of
human life. The youngest members of our society are viewed as a commodity
for use in research and for the development of possible cures for various
diseases. The most vulnerable members of the human race often are referred
to as “excess” embryos, “frozen tissue” in IVF clinics, “potential” human
beings. Even members of Congress known to be pro-life have wavered on the
issue of harvesting embryonic stem cells from frozen embryos destined to be
discarded from fertility clinics across the country.
The more recent arguments surrounding the controversy of using taxpayer's
money to support embryonic stem cell research have revolved around the
Castle-DeGette bill (H.R. 810). The focus of this bill, passed in the House
of Representatives on Tuesday, May 24, 2005, is to override President Bush's
earlier ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research on embryonic
stem cell lines derived after August 2001. While those who contend that
these embryos are only potential human beings believe that they should be
used in research because they may possibly be useful for curing diseases,
others disagree. Republican Majority Leader Tom DeLay stated that the bill
would use taxpayer funding for "the dismemberment of living, distinct human
beings" (BBC News, 2005).1
In fact, "the dismemberment of living, distinct human beings" is an
excellent description of the process of embryonic stem cell research. These
frozen embryos are not just “potential” human beings; they are in every way
human life.
It is ironic that on the same day Congress passed a bill aimed at using
taxpayer dollars to fund the destruction of frozen embryos from IVF clinics
for research purposes, President Bush was supporting the adoption of these
same embryos. On Tuesday, May 24, 2005, President Bush welcomed to the White
House families who had adopted so-called excess embryos, as well as those
who had given their embryos for adoption. The President also welcomed
Nightlight Christian Adoptions and applauded their embryo adoption program,
Snowflakes Frozen Embryo Adoption. The President praised the families who
gave up their embryos for adoption for choosing a "life-affirming"
alternative for their frozen embryos (The White House, 2005). As a result of
those choices, twenty-one children, adopted as embryos, were present for
Mr. Bush's remarks.
The adoption of frozen embryos is an excellent alternative to their being
discarded or destroyed for research purposes. Nightlight's Snowflakes Frozen
Embryo Adoption Program began in 1997, and has matched 230 genetic families
with 145 adopting families. Currently, 81 babies have been born and more are
on the way (Nightlight Christian Adoptions, 2005).2 The fact that “excess”
frozen embryos can be adopted and allowed to develop into fully functioning
members of the human race also indicates that these embryos are not just
potential human beings. In fact, these embryos truly are the smallest and
most vulnerable people in our society, and they should be given the same
respect as any other member of society.
President Bush took a firm stance on the fact that embryonic stem cell
research destroys human life. He stated, "In the complex debate over
embryonic stem cell research, we must remember that real human lives are
involved—both the lives of those with diseases that might find cures from
this research, and the lives of the embryos that will be destroyed in the
process." He further explained that while he has increased funding for adult
stem cell research, he believes that the Castle-DeGette bill "would take us
across a critical ethical line by creating new incentives for the ongoing
destruction of emerging human life." Indeed, as the President stated in
reference to those in the audience, "The children here today are reminders
that every human life is a precious gift of matchless value" (The White
House, 2005).3 CBHD
|
Printer- Friendly
Version |
|
Copyright 2005 by The Center for Bioethics and Human
Dignity
The contents of this article do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
CBHD, its staff, board or supporters. Permission to reprint granted as long as The Center for Bioethics and
Human Dignity and the web address for this article is referenced.
|
|