Cloning

Cloning Bibliography

The following sources do not necessarily reflect the Center's positions or values. These sources, however, are excellent resources for familiarizing oneself with all sides of the issue.

Cloning Annotated Bibliography

The following sources do not necessarily reflect the Center's positions or values. These sources, however, are excellent resources for familiarizing oneself with all sides of the issue.

 Harris, John. Clones, Genes, and Immortality: Ethics and the Genetic Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

 

Embryonic, Fetal, and Post-Natal Animal-Human Mixtures: An Ethical Discussion

Overview: The potential power of embryonic and fetal inter-species mixtures became clear about a decade ago in a series of dramatic experiments in which small sections of brains from developing quails were taken and transplanted into the developing brains of chickens. The resulting chickens exhibited vocal trills and head bobs unique to quails, proving that the transplanted parts of the brain contained the neural circuitry for quail calls.

On the UN's Failure to Pass an Anti-Cloning Treaty

Recent efforts to ban human cloning through the United Nations have apparently failed. The final outcome likely will be a “less powerful, nonbinding declaration that would include language ambiguous enough to please both sides.”1 In other words, this august body is rising to the challenge of finding words that will mean all things to all people and therefore will mean nothing at all.

Human Cloning: What's at Stake

Amid the current debate over cloning not nearly enough attention is being paid to the children who may be produced through cloning. When attention is paid to the clones themselves, often people ask: Are clones human beings? Are they of the same moral status as the rest of us? Do they have souls?

Clones from Newcastle

In a move that should surprise no one, the United Kingdom’s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has licensed researchers at the University of Newcastle to clone human embryos.

For some time Britain has had the most liberal policy in the world on embryo experimentation, permitting research on very young embryos. In 2001, British law was changed to allow the cloning of human embryos for the purposes of research, as long as the embryos were so-called “spare embryos” that would be discarded anyway.

AMA Approves Creating Life for Destructive Purposes

The American Medical Association (AMA)--the largest professional organization of medical doctors in the United States--announced in late June its support for human cloning for research purposes.1 The AMA's house of delegates also passed a resolution containing guidelines for physicians who themselves wish to harvest stem cells from cloned human embryos for the purpose of medical research.2 This formal decision places the nation's largest medical association in the camp of those who believe it is acceptable to create life for t

Cloning Twist Clouds Ethical Complexities

Scientists attending the April 2003 Human Genome Organization meeting in Cancun, Mexico claimed that a new technique could overcome ethical and safety objections to reproductive cloning.1 This technique would involve the creation of a cloned human embryo, from whom embryonic stem (ES) cells would be extracted and stimulated to develop into presumably healthy sperm or eggs (a process known as gametogenesis).

The Interface Between Science and Ethics: Probing the Deeper Questions

Debates over bioethical issues necessarily involve people from diverse circles. Scientists, health care professionals, lawyers, clergy, and representatives from other disciplines join formally trained bioethicists in assessing the appropriateness of various forays within medicine and biotechnology. It is my hypothesis that the way scientists think is often so fundamentally different that the "answers" to bioethical issues offered by the non-scientific community are perceived as (at best) only minimally relevant by those who are actually pursuing the research in question.

The Cloning

The announcement by the Raelian sect's Clonaid company that they have delivered the first live-born human clone may be true. It may not. It seems unlikely. The best efforts of Michael West's Massachusetts-based Advanced Cell Technology, announced in a blaze of glory over Thanksgiving 2001, amounted to an admission that they could not even clone an embryo and keep it going for more than a few cell-divisions. The Chinese claim to be cloning embryos and harvesting stem-cells from them, though they have yet to prove it.