Over the last century, the women’s rights movement coupled with technological advances brought far-reaching changes to the lives of women. As women fought for equality and empowerment, the autonomy of women over their own bodies was secured, resulting in increased emphasis on reproductive liberty. As the language of liberty stands as a defense for these reproductive technologies, proponents commonly use the language of rights: defending a “women’s right to choose,” “her right” to donate eggs, and her “parental right” to use technology like preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Recently, however, we have seen an increased unease over the commodification and objectification of women. These reproductive technologies, we will argue, further contribute to both commodification and objectification of women, and subsequent disempowerment of women. Furthermore, we will suggest that reproductive liberty and commodification/objectification may be innately bound, thus, having one without the other is nearly impossible. In our current market-based framework, reproductive technologies are naturally prone to the commodification of women. As women’s bodies are increasingly understood as parts, rather than integrative wholes, we can expect nothing less than this commodification. Uteruses become ‘rooms for rent,’ and egg donation—which may as well be called ‘egg vending’—becomes a part of the supply/demand and quality-assurance economic dialogue. Likewise, reproductive technologies contribute to objectification. Because women ‘can’ have control over their reproduction, we now naturally assume women must utilize that control. Thus, we are increasingly susceptible to oversexualization—assuming sexual intercourse without any chance of procreation. We should certainly admit that women have been wrongfully treated as property in the past. Nonetheless, we should question whether reproductive freedom rectifies or liberates us from that paradigm. It appears women are not entirely empowered by their newfound autonomy, but, rather, held captive by it.